Experimental investigations on implicatures: a window into the semantics/pragmatics interface
نویسنده
چکیده
It is traditionally assumed in the linguistic-pragmatic literature that Scalar Implicatures (A or B >> either A or B but not both; some of the Fs>> at least one but not all of the Fs) are explicitly defeasible, structure-dependent and defeasible in context. We present three off-line studies that demonstrate the psycholinguistic reality of these properties of Scalar Implicatures (henceforth SIs). We then present two on-line text comprehension experiments that investigate the time-course of generating SIs and support a pragmatic account of SIs, according to which SIs are generated only when both structural and contextual constraints license them. We aim to demonstrate how an experimental approach can be informative on core issues in the semantics/pragmatics literature.
منابع مشابه
The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface
We survey three domains – scalar implicatures, presupposition, and conventional implicatures – in which the division of labor between semantics and pragmatics has given rise to new empirical and formal insights in the last decade. In each case, there is a vibrant contemporary debate concerning the modular decomposition of rich arrays of data.
متن کاملModularity and Intuitions in Formal Semantics: the Case of Polarity Items∗
Linguists often sharply distinguish the different modules that support linguistics competence, e.g., syntax, semantics, pragmatics. However, recent work has identified phenomena in syntax (polarity sensitivity) and pragmatics (implicatures), which seem to rely on semantic properties (monotonicity). We propose to investigate these phenomena and their connections as a window into the modularity o...
متن کاملExperimental results on embedded implicatures
This handout reviews recent experimental results concerning the prevalence of embedded scalar implicatures. The focus is on Geurts and Pouscoulous 2009 (henceforth GP09), which argues that these implicatures are marginal at best, and Chemla and Spector 2011 (CS11), which argues that they are robust. I also include brief summaries of the three commentaries on GP09 that appeared in 2010 in Semant...
متن کاملThe Semantics and Pragmatics of Logical Connectives: Adults' and Children's Interpretations of And and Or in a Guessing Game
The development of the ubiquitous logical connectives and and or provides a window into the role of semantics and pragmatics in children’s linguistic development. Previous research has suggested that adults and children might differ in their interpretation of or in two ways. First, unlike adults, children might interpret or as logical conjunction, akin to and. Second, children might interpret o...
متن کاملFrom scalar semantics to implicature: children's interpretation of aspectuals.
One of the tasks of language learning is the discovery of the intricate division of labour between the lexical-semantic content of an expression and the pragmatic inferences the expression can be used to convey. Here we investigate experimentally the development of the semantics-pragmatics interface, focusing on Greek-speaking five-year-olds' interpretation of aspectual expressions such as arxi...
متن کامل